The applicant company complained, in particular, of the continuing practice of the customs office to attribute a wrong code to its imported goods, entailing a higher customs duty, contrary to the factual findings of numerous final judgments in the applicant company's favour. The Court declares the complaint under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 admissible and the complaint under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention inadmissible. The Court holds that there has been a violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (interference with the peaceful enjoyment of its possessions).