Request for a preliminary ruling from the Augstākā tiesa in the case Veloserviss.
Should the importer's obligation to act in good faith, laid down in Article 220(2)(b) of Council Regulation No 2913/92 1 of 12 October 1992 establishing the Community Customs Code, be defined as meaning that:
(a) it includes an obligation on the importer to verify the circumstances in which the Form A certificate granted to the exporter was issued (certificates regarding the parts which constitute the goods, the role of the exporter in the manufacture of the goods, etc.)?
(b) the importer acted in bad faith for no other reason than that the exporter acted in bad faith (for example, where the exporter failed to reveal the true origin of the costs, the value of the parts which constitute the goods, etc., to the customs authorities of the exporting country)?
(c) the obligation to act in good faith has not been fulfilled for no other reason than that the exporter submitted incorrect information to the customs authorities of the exporting country, and that is so even where the customs authorities themselves committed errors in issuing the certificate?