The compatibility with EU law of national rules, such as those at issue in the main proceedings, under which a company resident in a Member State cannot set off corporation tax paid in another Member State or in a third State by capital companies distributing dividends, because of the exemption of those dividends from tax in the first Member State when they stem from shareholdings representing at least 10% of the capital of the company making the distribution and, in the case in point, the actual shareholding of the capital company receiving the dividends exceeds 90% and the recipient company has been incorporated in accordance with the law of a third State, must be assessed in the light of Articles 63 TFEU and 65 TFEU. Article 63 TFEU must be interpreted as not precluding application of the exemption method to dividends distributed by companies resident in other Member States and in third States, when the imputation method is applied to dividends distributed by companies resident in the same Member State as the company receiving them and, if the latter company records losses, the imputation method results in the tax paid by the resident company that made the distribution being fully or partially refunded.
Gerelateerde artikelen
Zet Europees plan de Nederlandse soevereiniteit op belastinggebied onder druk?
Op 24 juni jl. heeft de Europese Commissie een fiscaal plan gelanceerd om de administratieve lasten en compliancekosten van het bedrijfsleven fors te verlagen en de Europese concurrentiekracht te versterken, 'Direct Tax Omnibus' genaamd. Het Nederlands bedrijfsleven omarmt het vereenvoudigingsplan maar belastingadviseurs en wetenschappers zijn kritisch.
Maastrichtse corporatie procedeert om ATAD-regeling
Woningcorporatie Servatius uit Maastricht is een beroepsprocedure gestart tegen de Belastingdienst over de toepassing van de zogeheten ATAD-regeling, een belastingmaatregel die volgens woningcorporaties ten koste gaat van investeringen in sociale huurwoningen. Dat meldt het stadsmagazine De Nieuwe Ster.